NO TTH Discussion

Anything that doesn't fit the other categories
Toast

NO TTH Discussion

Post by Toast » 21 Jul 2008, 10:38

[08-07-21][12:28:48 | SE] <Toast> if u add in your CMD No TTH Support found as a built in action
[08-07-21][12:28:58 | SE] <Toast> apex and rsx has multible selction
[08-07-21][12:29:03 | SE] <Toast> just yours that doesnt
[08-07-21][12:29:40 | SE] <Toast> if u add the no tth support in the built in cmd then i can skip having this detection in the list
[08-07-21][12:29:52 | SE] <Toast> code can be found in rsx and in apex for that
[08-07-21][12:30:05 | SE] <Toast> thats my small request
[08-07-21][12:30:50 | CZ] <BigMuscle> i will have a look at it, but i don't want to add any special functions which can be done in client profiles
[08-07-21][12:31:01 | SE] <Toast> bah pretty pls
[08-07-21][12:31:21 | SE] <Toast> it gets kinda messy for apex and rsx users if there are dubble detections
[08-07-21][12:33:03 | SE] <Toast> Now playing @ 256kbps: Beam Feat. Niki Saletta - I Roam (Dave May Electrohouse Excursion) (03:49/05:12) (Played:73%)
[08-07-21][12:36:34 | CZ] <BigMuscle> Toast: so ask them to remove the feature why there whould be some bloat code if it can be easily done via one client profile
[08-07-21][12:36:43 | SE] <Toast> hehe
[08-07-21][12:36:48 | SE] <Toast> u ask em
[08-07-21][12:37:13 | SE] <Toast> i nag on them constantly .P
[08-07-21][12:37:14 | SE] <Toast>
[08-07-21][12:37:37 | CZ] <BigMuscle> hehe, I don't need to ask them, I don't want it

Crise
Senior Member
Posts: 139
Joined: 10 Nov 2007, 21:34

Re: NO TTH Discussion

Post by Crise » 24 Jul 2008, 19:53

Lee wrote:Is Crise aware of this?
Yes I am ;) my part is already done...

MikeJJ
Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: 22 Jun 2008, 12:05

Re: NO TTH Discussion

Post by MikeJJ » 25 Jul 2008, 12:24

Toast wrote: [08-07-21][12:36:34 | CZ] <BigMuscle> Toast: so ask them to remove the feature why there whould be some bloat code if it can be easily done via one client profile
I would think something like this is better off hardcoded, as it isn't going to change. it'll be more a lot efficient, and only take a few lines of c++.

Toast

Re: NO TTH Discussion

Post by Toast » 25 Jul 2008, 12:59

Well it hard for me todo the profiles when some support it and some dont
and it was BMs Request and mine that it could be only AML Supported that way every client has it cause im not going to remove it

MikeJJ
Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: 22 Jun 2008, 12:05

Re: NO TTH Discussion

Post by MikeJJ » 25 Jul 2008, 18:53

Okay, i just take the view, that anything which Never changes, should be hardcoded.
As it's unchanging, it shouldn't need a profile.
Not only will it be faster that way it'll also mean smaller, easier to maintain profiles. :)

If you want to see what i mean from an efficiency point of view, use a client with the Debug Window, and enable CDM Debug Messages. Watch it scroll though every XML entry (well until it gets a match on an entry) for every profile for every user (i remember this from the DCDM days).

Crise
Senior Member
Posts: 139
Joined: 10 Nov 2007, 21:34

Re: NO TTH Discussion

Post by Crise » 25 Jul 2008, 19:30

tbh. I agree with MikeJJ's point of view, but figured it's no use making things difficult... not like adrian/Toast are going to listen to me :P (Toast because, well he's Toast and Adrian because he seems to dislike hardcoded detections to begin with).

adrian_007
Senior Member
Posts: 126
Joined: 06 Jan 2008, 13:00

Re: NO TTH Discussion

Post by adrian_007 » 25 Jul 2008, 20:32

in this certain thing i can agree with you and mikejj, this thing never gonna change. also some ppl maybe just don't need to use all profiles/uses his own ;)

Toast

Re: NO TTH Discussion

Post by Toast » 26 Jul 2008, 00:33

Well if all devs execept BM wants it its up to you guys to convince BM to insert it into sDC then i can drop it from the profiles

simple all client should have this detection hardcoded or not

adrian_007
Senior Member
Posts: 126
Joined: 06 Jan 2008, 13:00

Re: NO TTH Discussion

Post by adrian_007 » 26 Jul 2008, 00:46

do i really care? do bm really care? ... it seems like you're the only one who don't like this situation... just keep that damn one item in list and everyone will be happy :P

(from coder point of view, this detection is done far before profiles check)

Toast

Re: NO TTH Discussion

Post by Toast » 26 Jul 2008, 00:56

From my point of view its standardization in detection feature

Locked