NO TTH Discussion
NO TTH Discussion
[08-07-21][12:28:48 | SE] <Toast> if u add in your CMD No TTH Support found as a built in action
[08-07-21][12:28:58 | SE] <Toast> apex and rsx has multible selction
[08-07-21][12:29:03 | SE] <Toast> just yours that doesnt
[08-07-21][12:29:40 | SE] <Toast> if u add the no tth support in the built in cmd then i can skip having this detection in the list
[08-07-21][12:29:52 | SE] <Toast> code can be found in rsx and in apex for that
[08-07-21][12:30:05 | SE] <Toast> thats my small request
[08-07-21][12:30:50 | CZ] <BigMuscle> i will have a look at it, but i don't want to add any special functions which can be done in client profiles
[08-07-21][12:31:01 | SE] <Toast> bah pretty pls
[08-07-21][12:31:21 | SE] <Toast> it gets kinda messy for apex and rsx users if there are dubble detections
[08-07-21][12:33:03 | SE] <Toast> Now playing @ 256kbps: Beam Feat. Niki Saletta - I Roam (Dave May Electrohouse Excursion) (03:49/05:12) (Played:73%)
[08-07-21][12:36:34 | CZ] <BigMuscle> Toast: so ask them to remove the feature why there whould be some bloat code if it can be easily done via one client profile
[08-07-21][12:36:43 | SE] <Toast> hehe
[08-07-21][12:36:48 | SE] <Toast> u ask em
[08-07-21][12:37:13 | SE] <Toast> i nag on them constantly .P
[08-07-21][12:37:14 | SE] <Toast>
[08-07-21][12:37:37 | CZ] <BigMuscle> hehe, I don't need to ask them, I don't want it
[08-07-21][12:28:58 | SE] <Toast> apex and rsx has multible selction
[08-07-21][12:29:03 | SE] <Toast> just yours that doesnt
[08-07-21][12:29:40 | SE] <Toast> if u add the no tth support in the built in cmd then i can skip having this detection in the list
[08-07-21][12:29:52 | SE] <Toast> code can be found in rsx and in apex for that
[08-07-21][12:30:05 | SE] <Toast> thats my small request
[08-07-21][12:30:50 | CZ] <BigMuscle> i will have a look at it, but i don't want to add any special functions which can be done in client profiles
[08-07-21][12:31:01 | SE] <Toast> bah pretty pls
[08-07-21][12:31:21 | SE] <Toast> it gets kinda messy for apex and rsx users if there are dubble detections
[08-07-21][12:33:03 | SE] <Toast> Now playing @ 256kbps: Beam Feat. Niki Saletta - I Roam (Dave May Electrohouse Excursion) (03:49/05:12) (Played:73%)
[08-07-21][12:36:34 | CZ] <BigMuscle> Toast: so ask them to remove the feature why there whould be some bloat code if it can be easily done via one client profile
[08-07-21][12:36:43 | SE] <Toast> hehe
[08-07-21][12:36:48 | SE] <Toast> u ask em
[08-07-21][12:37:13 | SE] <Toast> i nag on them constantly .P
[08-07-21][12:37:14 | SE] <Toast>
[08-07-21][12:37:37 | CZ] <BigMuscle> hehe, I don't need to ask them, I don't want it
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 10 Nov 2007, 21:34
Re: NO TTH Discussion
Yes I am my part is already done...Lee wrote:Is Crise aware of this?
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 22 Jun 2008, 12:05
Re: NO TTH Discussion
I would think something like this is better off hardcoded, as it isn't going to change. it'll be more a lot efficient, and only take a few lines of c++.Toast wrote: [08-07-21][12:36:34 | CZ] <BigMuscle> Toast: so ask them to remove the feature why there whould be some bloat code if it can be easily done via one client profile
Re: NO TTH Discussion
Well it hard for me todo the profiles when some support it and some dont
and it was BMs Request and mine that it could be only AML Supported that way every client has it cause im not going to remove it
and it was BMs Request and mine that it could be only AML Supported that way every client has it cause im not going to remove it
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 22 Jun 2008, 12:05
Re: NO TTH Discussion
Okay, i just take the view, that anything which Never changes, should be hardcoded.
As it's unchanging, it shouldn't need a profile.
Not only will it be faster that way it'll also mean smaller, easier to maintain profiles.
If you want to see what i mean from an efficiency point of view, use a client with the Debug Window, and enable CDM Debug Messages. Watch it scroll though every XML entry (well until it gets a match on an entry) for every profile for every user (i remember this from the DCDM days).
As it's unchanging, it shouldn't need a profile.
Not only will it be faster that way it'll also mean smaller, easier to maintain profiles.
If you want to see what i mean from an efficiency point of view, use a client with the Debug Window, and enable CDM Debug Messages. Watch it scroll though every XML entry (well until it gets a match on an entry) for every profile for every user (i remember this from the DCDM days).
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 10 Nov 2007, 21:34
Re: NO TTH Discussion
tbh. I agree with MikeJJ's point of view, but figured it's no use making things difficult... not like adrian/Toast are going to listen to me (Toast because, well he's Toast and Adrian because he seems to dislike hardcoded detections to begin with).
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 126
- Joined: 06 Jan 2008, 13:00
Re: NO TTH Discussion
in this certain thing i can agree with you and mikejj, this thing never gonna change. also some ppl maybe just don't need to use all profiles/uses his own
Re: NO TTH Discussion
Well if all devs execept BM wants it its up to you guys to convince BM to insert it into sDC then i can drop it from the profiles
simple all client should have this detection hardcoded or not
simple all client should have this detection hardcoded or not
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 126
- Joined: 06 Jan 2008, 13:00
Re: NO TTH Discussion
do i really care? do bm really care? ... it seems like you're the only one who don't like this situation... just keep that damn one item in list and everyone will be happy
(from coder point of view, this detection is done far before profiles check)
(from coder point of view, this detection is done far before profiles check)